Article Text
PDF
Abstract
COVID-19 has further exacerbated trends of widening health inequalities in the UK. Shockingly, the number of years of life lived in general good health differs by over 18 years between the most and least deprived areas of England. Poor diets and obesity are established major risk factors for chronic cardiometabolic diseases and cancer, as well as severe COVID-19. For doctors to provide the best care to their patients, there is an urgent need to improve nutrition education in undergraduate medical school training. With this imperative, the Association for Nutrition established the Inter-Professional Working Group on Medical Education (AfN IPG) to develop a new, modern undergraduate nutrition curriculum for medical doctors. The AfN IPG brought together expertise from nutrition, dietetic and medical professionals, representing the National Health Service, royal colleges, medical schools and universities, government public health departments, learned societies, medical students and nutrition educators. The curriculum was developed with the key objective of being implementable through integration with the current undergraduate training of medical doctors. Through an iterative and transparent consultative process, 13 key nutritional competencies, to be achieved through mastery of 11 graduation fundamentals, were established. The curriculum to facilitate the achievement of these key competencies is divided into eight topic areas, each underpinned by a learning objective statement and teaching points detailing the knowledge and skills development required. The teaching points can be achieved through clinical teaching and a combination of facilitated learning activities and practical skills acquisition. Therefore, the nutrition curriculum enables mastery of these nutritional competencies in a way that will complement and strengthen medical students’ achievement of the General Medical Council Outcomes for Graduates. As nutrition is an integrative science, the AfN IPG recommends the curriculum is incorporated into initial undergraduate medical studies before specialist training. This will enable our future doctors to recognise how nutrition is related to multiple aspects of their training, from physiological systems to patient-centred care, and acquire a broad, inclusive understanding of health and disease. In addition, it will facilitate medical schools to embed nutrition learning opportunities within the core medical training, without the need to add in a large number of new components to an already crowded programme or with additional burden to teaching staff. The undergraduate nutrition curriculum for medical doctors is designed to support medical schools to create future doctors who will understand and recognise the role of nutrition in health. Moreover, it will equip front-line staff to feel empowered to raise nutrition-related issues with their patients as a fundamental part of enhanced care and to appropriately refer on for nutrition support with a registered nutritionist (RNutr)/registered associate nutritionist (ANutr) or a registered dietitian (RD) where this is likely to be beneficial.
- Precision nutrition
- Nutrition assessment
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
What is already known on this topic
Medical students currently receive little nutrition training within their foundational medical education and have reported feeling inadequately prepared to consider nutrition factors within assessments of patients’ presentation and care.
What this study adds
This work provides a framework for the foundational nutrition knowledge required by medical students to support full achievement of the GMC Outcomes for Graduates and the NHS Long Term Plan.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
Medical Schools will be able to use this curriculum to incorporate nutrition into their training of future doctors and it can be used to inform on appropriate nutrition components for inclusion in the incoming medical licensing assessment.
Background
The relationship between malnutrition (which includes undernutrition, overnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies) and ill health is unequivocal.1 Globally suboptimal diets are now the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality from a range of chronic diseases, in particular cardiovascular disease, cancers and type 2 diabetes.2 Specifically, in 2017, inadequate dietary patterns (high in sodium; low in whole grains, fruits, vegetables, nuts and seeds, and omega-3 fatty acids) were responsible for more deaths globally than tobacco smoking. Notably, however, evidence suggests that making dietary changes in line with those of public health recommendations across the globe (eg, increased whole grains, fish and vegetables, and decreased processed meats, sugar and salt) may be associated with increase in life expectancy.3 Modelling of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study has suggested sustained dietary change, from a Western diet to an optimised healthy diet made at age 20 and upheld through life, could increase life expectancy by over a decade.4 Although such modelling studies have their caveats, these data are in line with numerous population studies that show following healthier dietary practices to be correlated with reductions in mortality risk from chronic diseases such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and some cancers.3 5–7
Undernutrition is a poorly recognised public health problem, associated with many adverse outcomes including increased hospital admissions, longer lengths of hospital stay, clinical complications and increased mortality.8 In the UK, prior to the pandemic, undernutrition was estimated to affect over three million people at a cost of £23.5 billion.8 Simultaneously, the prevalence of overweight and obesity in the UK has never been higher, and in England alone costs the National Health Service (NHS) £6.1 billion and the wider society £27 billion annually.9 Almost two-thirds of English adults (63%; 67% of men and 60% of women) are overweight (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2) and more than one in four (27%; 26% of men and 29% of women) are living with obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2).10 New data from the National Child Measurement Programme in England suggest a dramatic increase in both the percentage of children at reception (ages 4–5) and year 6 (ages 11–12) living with overweight and obesity.11 Moreover, the deprivation gap has widened. For instance, at reception the prevalence of obesity is 20.3% in children from the most deprived families, in contrast to 7.8% in children from the least deprived families.11
While excess weight has been a major focus of public health, it is important to recognise the significance of micronutrient deficiencies arising from poor-quality diets and suboptimal dietary patterns. UK dietary survey data suggest substantial proportions of some population groups have low intake of various essential vitamins and minerals,12 13 and income analysis suggests intake of most micronutrients tends to increase with income.14 The pandemic has shone harsh light on persistent and widening health, socioeconomic and geographical inequalities, as well as inequality in the prevention, management and treatment of malnutrition.15 16 For example, in a retrospective longitudinal study exploring UK and US pandemic diet and lifestyle behaviours, disruption of healthy lifestyle behaviours was higher in younger, female and socioeconomically deprived participants.17 Separately, NHS Digital data showed an almost 50% increase in the number of under-20s admitted to hospital with an eating disorder in 2020–2021 compared with the previous year, with the number exceeding 3200.18 This was reported to be a result of insufficient community support provision to meet demand, leading to an increase in the number reaching the point of hospitalisation.18
Adults aged over 60 years are more likely than younger age groups to suffer from malnutrition. A recent Age UK survey reported that since the beginning of the pandemic, 1.4 million older people in England aged 60+ have been eating less and 3.7 million reported that they, or others in their household, have been unable to eat nutritious food. Therefore, pandemic-related stressors have further increased the risk of undernutrition and malnutrition in this already vulnerable age group.19 Socioeconomic challenges that decrease food access, including food poverty and food insecurity, negatively impact on physical and mental health and quality of life and underscore the complex biological, social and environmental determinants of malnutrition.16 20 21 This has been recognised in public health policy and white papers such as the National Food Strategy and Levelling Up the UK.22 The National Food Strategy aimed to help widen focus on the interplay between food and health systems, climate change, and economic and political drivers.23 The combination of stressors (COVID-19 and obesity pandemics, as well as climate change) perhaps means that the need for effective and evidence-based nutrition education for medical doctors and healthcare professionals has never been so critical.
The specific role of medical doctors in addressing nutrition in clinical practice has been acknowledged by multiple authoritative professional bodies.24 The General Medical Council (GMC) Outcomes for Graduates sets out the following for what newly qualified doctors must be able to do with respect to nutrition: recognise where poor nutrition is contributing to ill health; take action by seeking advice from colleagues and making appropriate referrals; apply principles and knowledge relating to nutrition to medical practice and integrate these into patient care; and lastly, discuss the role and impact of nutrition on the health of individual patients and societies.25 Moreover, in the 2019 NHS Long Term Plan, which has a major focus on the prevention of disease and health inequalities, a commitment was set to ensure nutrition has a greater place in professional education training. This was specifically so that doctors would be encouraged to address the role of nutrition in health in an informed and sensitive way and refer cases appropriately where nutrition support is required.26
Intuitively, equipping the next generation of medical doctors with appropriate nutritional competencies should support disease prevention and improve clinical outcomes.27 28 Yet, while medical students and trainees acknowledge they need to develop their skills and knowledge in nutrition, there are widespread reports of insufficient nutrition education during medical training in the UK and globally.27 29–32 Pooled survey and evaluation data suggest most UK medical students and doctors feel their nutrition training was inadequate, with more than 70% reporting they could identify less than 2 hours across their academic and clinical training.29 Separate research has suggested that in fact students underestimate the amount of nutrition content in their medical education.30 33 34 This documented divergence between medical students’ perception of nutrition content and actual teaching hours perhaps highlights a need for nutrition teaching to be explicitly flagged to students.30 33 34
This will inevitably be not without challenges. How to best incorporate nutrition knowledge and clinical skills as components of medical education and clinical practice in an already complex and demanding medical curriculum may require new integrative approaches.35 However, tackling these challenges is critical to providing the effective nutrition care required given the current levels of malnutrition and chronic disease patterns. Doctors do not need to be nutritionists, but they can play a critical role in reducing the health impacts of poor nutrition, namely by recognising the contribution of nutrition to clinical and population health, and developing the knowledge, skills and confidence to either offer advice or refer on appropriately depending on the context.36 Knowledge and practice in appropriate referrals to specialists are important because if doctors or healthcare professionals are not providing nutrition information and advice, patients will seek information elsewhere. Evidence-based nutrition and accurate information on food and health can be difficult to find in a contested space filled with commercial interests, social media and influencers.36 37
A nutrition curriculum for nutritional competency standards
Responsibility for the undergraduate nutrition curriculum for medical students was transferred from the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AoMRC) to the Association for Nutrition (AfN) in 2018. Founded in 2008, the AfN is a charity and independent regulator that accredits university undergraduate programmes awarding undergraduate and taught postgraduate (ie, BSc and MSc) degrees in human nutrition in the UK. In addition to providing quality assurance schemes for assessment of nutrition training, the AfN is responsible for assessing the professional competency of nutritionists and awarding the professional titles Registered Nutritionist (RNutr) and Registered Associate Nutritionist (ANutr).38
While a working group of the AoMRC had previously outlined what newly qualified doctors should understand about nutrition,39 this guidance was not embedded in competency standards. Such standards can help determine the required knowledge and skills for safe and effective care aligned to optimising health along with patients’ priorities.40 In addition, competency standards can provide a useful framework to support curriculum developers within medical schools to provide nutrition training that is both relevant to clinical medical practice and will manage student expectations. With transfer of responsibility for the undergraduate nutrition curriculum for medical students to the AfN, the AoMRC and GMC gave their support for the AfN to develop a modern curriculum that supports the achievement of GMC outcomes for medical graduates and provides the fundamental nutrition knowledge and skills needed by our future doctors.38
Methods
To understand how this should be best achieved and to ensure realistic deliverability of the updated curriculum into core teaching for medical students, the AfN formed the Inter-Professional Working Group for Medical Education (AfN IPG). The group brought together expert professionals and organisations, as well as those who would play a key role in the delivery of, or be influenced by, the updated curriculum. The working group represented Public Health England, NHS England, nutrition and dietetic professionals, medical royal colleges, medical schools, medical students, doctors and training providers. The nutrition curriculum was developed through collaborative and open discussion between group members over a number of meetings, with an agreement reached by consensus over the required detail and structure. It was developed without external funding, with all parties freely donating their time and expertise. Any declarations of interests were required to be reported by working group members at each meeting.
Both the current requirements and multiple additional opportunities that exist within the GMC Outcomes for Graduates to include nutrition in their core curriculum for undergraduate medical training are outlined in table 1. These demonstrate the key roles that nutrition plays across the central GMC themes and provide a strong rationale for the development of an integrated curriculum, whereby nutrition is taught within core and specialty training, and not as a separate stand-alone topic—indeed, an integrated curriculum where, throughout students’ training, the relationship between nutrition, health and disease is reiterated as fundamental and essential for optimal patient-centred care.
Identification of where the requirement or opportunity exists to include nutrition within the expected curriculum for medical students in the UK, as defined by the UK General Medical Council (GMC) Outcomes for Graduates25
In September 2020, a public stakeholder consultation was held on an initial draft curriculum document. This gave a wide body of stakeholders (medical schools, royal colleges, medical and nutrition organisations, training providers, nutrition and dietetic students, medical professionals, and nutrition professionals) the opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed curriculum. Targeted questions encouraged comments on the curriculum structure, content and achievability. In addition, stakeholders in medical schools were invited to comment on their local practices. Namely, details on local nutrition expertise and teaching practices and examples of nutrition inclusion within the current core teaching in respondents’ medical schools were solicited. Stakeholders were also asked to comment on what they viewed as potential implementation barriers as well as facilitative opportunities. The working group reviewed the responses to the consultation to produce the final version of the undergraduate nutrition curriculum, alongside the identification of activities that would be beneficial to support its implementation, such as the production of suitable teaching resources and capacity assessment. The iterative cycle used for the development of the curriculum and its continual evaluation is illustrated in figure 1.
Flow chart of the development steps in creating the nutrition curriculum for undergraduate medical education. AfN, Association for Nutrition; IP, Intellectual Property; IPG, Inter-Professional Working Group for Medical Education; MLA, medical licensing assessment; QA, Quality Assurance.
The AfN undergraduate nutrition curriculum for medical students
The AfN Undergraduate Curriculum in Nutrition for Medical Doctors41 has been designed to be presented to medical students as an integral part of their general undergraduate training, making it clear how nutrition interrelates with the study of other systems and contributes to an inclusive understanding of health and disease. The structure of the curriculum document is outlined in figure 2. This illustrates how the curriculum statements with teaching points will support undergraduate medical students through the achievement of 11 graduation fundamentals to develop 13 core nutritional competencies by the point of graduation.
Key components of the nutrition curriculum for undergraduate medical education.
The curriculum statements and teaching points build knowledge and understanding in eight critical nutrition topic areas outlined in figure 3. Each topic is accompanied by a statement on the learning objective and detailed teaching points to support students’ acquisition of the key competencies. The teaching points can be achieved through a combination of facilitated learning activities, such as lectures and case-based, team-based or problem-based learning, supporting resources and activities and practical skills acquisition through clinical teaching, both simulated and at the ‘bedside’, thereby providing sufficient opportunity for students to meet all the learning outcomes detailed in this curriculum and achieve the key competencies for graduates in a way that complements their achievement of the GMC Outcomes for Graduates.25
Diagram of the eight topic areas the curriculum and teaching points address.
Support activities
To support the implementation of nutrition teaching, the curriculum has been mapped to achievement of the GMC Outcomes for Graduates25 at the level of key competencies, graduate fundamentals and curriculum statements. In addition, it has been identified where in the domains of the new medical licensing assessment (MLA), due to commence in 2024,41 nutritional factors can either be a causal or an influencing factor, or be impacted by the clinical condition or treatment.
The AfN also hosts a resource support section on their website,42 containing case studies from medical schools that have successfully incorporated nutrition training into their core teaching. These demonstrate how programmes have approached embedding nutrition within their curriculum and provide examples other programmes can use to aid curriculum reviews. To aid identification of suitable resources to support the delivery of the curriculum’s teaching points, the AfN has introduced a quality assurance scheme for resources to be assured as evidence-based and suitable for delivery of specified teaching points. The AfN IPG will also develop a bank of suitable nutrition questions for inclusion in the MLA and will submit these to the GMC, with amendments and new questions submitted as appropriate.
Discussion
In summary, a consensus-led, multistakeholder process led by the AfN has developed a modern nutrition curriculum for undergraduate medical students in the UK. The AfN IPG recommends that medical schools deliver 13 core nutritional competencies in order for future medical doctors to master 11 graduation fundamentals in nutrition by the point of their graduation.41 The strengths of the AfN IPG process included the involvement of a multistakeholder expert group; fundamental consideration of practical application and implementation of the curriculum by medical schools; iterative feedback from medical schools throughout; and an expansive public consultation process. The widespread adoption of this curriculum will provide consistency for the expectations and requirements for nutrition education in a manner that fully complements the GMC Learning Outcomes for Graduates.25 Therefore, the key teaching points and graduate fundamentals outlined in this new nutrition curriculum should be linked to the MLA.
Opportunities for implementation
A potential challenge raised by medical schools will be how to incorporate, what to some may first appear to be additional material, nutrition into an already incredibly dense curriculum.24 29 Clearly signposting to where nutritional science already exists in undergraduate medical foundational training is a clear first step that medical schools should take. For example, the core underpinning foundation of medical training, for example, biochemistry and physiology, can be presented through both a medical and nutritional science lens. Fundamentally, cellular metabolism and organ physiology, both in human health and disease, are completely interdependent on the catabolism and anabolism of substrates derived originally from dietary nutrients (and therefore food). Complementing this, the considered appraisal of nutrition status during history taking and person-centred approaches to patient assessment39 43 should be presented as requisite skills to enhance patient engagement.
The key is to explicitly highlight nutrition content where it is being taught, so medical students know it is core to their learning and can develop nutritional competencies relevant to medical practice as they progress. Rather than presenting nutrition as a stand-alone subject, it should be integrated into a holistic model of care. For example, nutrition is an important consideration in safe prescribing, both to prevent drug nutrient interactions44 and as an important non-pharmacological treatment that can reduce polypharmacy where appropriate.45–48 Although medical schools adhere to the same rigorous consistent standards for graduate expectations, curriculum design between schools varies from more traditional models (eg, preclinical science teaching in early years followed by clinical teaching later) to more integrated models that have clinical placements starting from year 1.49 This underscores that a variety of approaches to nutrition education are required.
Indeed, the new curriculum offers an incentive for medical schools to benchmark expected nutrition education outcomes, recognised as a crucial first step to improving nutrition education implementation.40 This provides curriculum developers the opportunity to map the nutrition that is currently taught in their programmes and further integrate nutrition where appropriate as a critical element of clinical assessment and treatment. Moreover, as highlighted in table 1, a critical review of the GMC’s current Outcomes for Graduates25 shows that the majority of learning domains either include nutrition explicitly or provide opportunity to enhance the learning of medical students through the inclusion of nutritional content and examples of nutritional practice in the provision of optimal healthcare. Emphasising the role of nutrition in these learning domains adds weight to the core nature of nutrition in medical practice.
Once teaching and materials have been embedded within the curricula, formal and rigorous assessment of taught content needs to follow, and therefore be developed, as assessment can help to focus and support student learning.50
Assessment of nutrition should be developed for the early and later years Objective Structured Clinical Examination and incorporated into applied knowledge assessments like the Safe Prescribing Assessment, as well as into the MLA and postgraduate examinations. Nutrition can be integrated into complex cases to aid decision making in situational judgement tests, which are used as part of the selection process for employment onto foundation programmes post graduation.51 This will require nutrition-trained faculty to be involved in the development of these assessments, which are ultimately needed to provide authentic assessment and produce doctors who are competent to use nutrition as a therapeutic option on graduation and throughout their careers.
Challenges
The place of nutrition in medical curricula has been reported as being peripheral.52 Often nutrition may be included as cocurricular or extracurricular activities, such as student-selected components, elective courses, research projects or external opportunities through student society-led groups such as Nutritank.53 Currently, medical doctors report rarely including nutrition in clinical care, with various cited reasons including time and confidence.29 In part this is likely due to a lack of nutrition education in their own training.41
Clinical role models are a key element of professional development recognised as an important hidden curriculum in healthcare professional training.49 Accessing appropriately qualified nutrition teachers from within the core medical teaching establishment can be problematic, necessitating a more interfaculty or even interinstitutional teaching model.49 54 A lack of professional role models in placements and faculty trained in nutrition is a clear barrier to adequate nutrition education in medical schools and to demonstrating how nutrition is integrated into clinical practice.55 Making better use of allied health professionals, such as registered nutritionists (ANutr/RNutr), registered dietitians (RD) and nutrition-trained nurses and pharmacists in multidisciplinary teams during clinical and community training offers the opportunity to enhance both interprofessional skills as well as the nutrition knowledge of future medical doctors.
In some universities, there may be opportunity to collaborate with either nutrition course faculty, registered nutritionists (ANutr/RNutr) or RD, but these may be limited by availability and capacity. Although interprofessional education (IPE) is becoming more prevalent in medical schools, some dietitians still report facing challenges in influencing the medical curriculum.56 This, alongside discipline differences in approaches to education, may also mean nutrition and dietetic professionals would need to adapt their approach and style of delivery to match that expected on medical degrees. Structurally and culturally, medical education may historically have been distinct in its specialism approach, context and assessment, relative to other health professions. However, the drive across all healthcare education to incorporate IPE provides an opportunity to explore nutrition across professional domains and challenging the restrictive action of healthcare professionals being predominately taught by their own profession.57
Many of the key aspects of the new nutrition curriculum support IPE as a common thread for all health professionals as they explore patient-focused case studies through the lens of their developing professional roles. This is an approach also recognised in the recently published recommendations from the UK Obesity Care Competencies Working Group facilitated by the College of Contemporary Health.58 These timely, obesity care competencies for healthcare education in the UK 58 are complementary to the nutrition curriculum, and ideally both sets of competencies should be mapped and adopted by medical schools in tandem. Indeed, more collaboration to develop the right IPE content and activities and facilitate medical teaching capacity is needed. Opportunities exist for medical schools to collaborate with local universities and organisations such as the AfN, the British Dietetic Association, the Nutrition Society, and the Need for Nutrition Education/Innovation Programme (NNEdPro) Global Centre for Nutrition and Health. In addition, there are clear opportunities to incorporate and use resources produced by nutrition experts from the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, the World Cancer Research Fund, and Health Education England, among others.
Interest in nutrition will likely not be universal among medical students and faculty.59 Although some groups, including those led by students such as Nutritank, have pushed for incorporating more nutrition training, others might not see nutrition as a priority to the immediate needs of patients on initial medical consultation. Indeed, in a European survey of medical school faculty, those responding did not feel more nutrition education was required.34 This may reflect the traditional pharmacological and surgical approaches to medical treatments and may be more apparent in some specialties than others, for example in acute medicine and surgery where medical priorities may represent life or death decisions. Therefore, incorporating diversity within faculties of medical educators, to include those from other health and nutrition professions, will likely facilitate the integration of nutrition into local programmes in the first instance. Once integrated, mapping learning to national graduate expectations and high-stake examinations will ensure the presence of nutrition in the curriculum of local medical schools beyond the interests of championing faculty.
Conclusions
Nutrition is a key modifiable factor in the prevention of disease and in healthy ageing. Given the current extraordinary prevalence of diet-related chronic diseases in the UK and the integral role nutrition plays in the treatment and rehabilitation of diseases, it is now imperative that nutrition fundamentals be embedded in core undergraduate training for medical doctors and be assessed in the new MLA in 2024. Medical doctors do not need to become nutritionists or dietitians, but should be equipped to confidently address malnutrition in all its forms. Doctors, who will see thousands of patients throughout their career, play a key role in helping to identify, treat and monitor nutrition-related conditions, as well as in delivering preventative medicine. Future doctors should therefore be skilled to discuss factors such as achieving a healthy weight in an informed and sensitive manner, as well as having the knowledge to refer patients to further nutrition support when appropriate. There is a clear opportunity now for medical schools to distinguish themselves based on the integration of nutrition practice into holistic healthcare training to adequately prepare graduates with the knowledge and skills in nutrition care, with the ultimate goal of improving patient care.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
The authors are all members of the AfN Inter-Professional Working Group on Medical Nutrition Education. The project received no external funding, with all members of the group giving their time and expertise freely and the AfN providing secretariat for the group.
References
Footnotes
Twitter @glenysjones, @macaninch, @drduanerd, @drtom_butler, @TheMooreLab
Presented at This article has been co-published with permission in British Journal of Nutrition and in BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health.
Contributors All authors were involved in the writing, review and editing of this article. Guarantor: GJ.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.