High precision but systematic offset in a standing bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) | BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health

Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Archive

Authors

About

BMJ NPH Collections
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

other Versions

You are currently viewing an earlier version of this article (December 30, 2022).
View the most recent version of this article

Original research

High precision but systematic offset in a standing bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Potter AW, Nindl LJ, Soto LD, et al

High precision but systematic offset in a standing bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health 2022;e000512. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2022-000512