Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effects of vitamin D supplementation on the glycaemic indices, lipid profile and liver function tests in patients with cirrhosis: a double-blind randomised controlled trial
  1. Seyedeh Roghayeh Derogar Kasmaei1,
  2. Karim Parastouei2,
  3. Behnam Hosseini Ahangar3,
  4. Mehdi Saberifiroozi4 and
  5. Maryam Taghdir2,5
  1. 1Student Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2Health Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease (BRCGL), Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4Liver and Pancreatobiliary Disease Research Center (LPDRC), Digestive Disease Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene - Faculty of Health, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  1. Correspondence to Dr Maryam Taghdir; mtaghdir{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Background Liver cirrhosis is considered a progressive disease that can eventually result in death. Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent in patients with cirrhosis. Few studies have been conducted on the effect of vitamin D supplementation in patients with cirrhosis.

Objectives The aim of this study was to identify the effect of vitamin D supplementation on lipid profile, glycaemic indices and liver function tests in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods Sixty patients with cirrhosis were involved in this double-blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. During the intervention, patients received one 50 000 IU pearl of vitamin D supplement or placebo per week for 12 weeks. Before and after supplementation, we assessed serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D3 (25(OH) D3), glycaemic indices (insulin, haemoglobin A1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG) and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)), lipid profile and liver function tests.

Results Baseline variables were not significantly different between groups. The present study indicated that over the 12 weeks, vitamin D supplementation significantly increased serum 25(OH) D3 (p<0.001), and also significantly decreased FBG (p=0.006), and HOMA-IR (p=0.001).

Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation significantly improves FBG and HOMA-IR as well as serum 25(OH) D3 in patients with cirrhosis.

Trial registration number The protocol of the study was registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (IRCT20140502017522N2).

  • Nutritional treatment

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

  • To the best of our knowledge, there is no research on the impact of vitamin D supplementation on patients with cirrhosis in Iran, and this research is the first research in this context.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

  • The results of this study showed that vitamin D supplementation (50000 IU/week for 12 weeks) enhance serum 25(OH)D3 as well as reduce HOMA-IR, and FBG levels in patients with cirrhosis.

HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

  • It is recommended to evaluate serum 25(OH) D3 in patients with cirrhosis.

  • Vitamin D supplementation is proposed as a complementary therapy in patients with cirrhosis.

Introduction

Liver cirrhosis is the last stage of chronic liver diseases (CLD) which progresses slowly over years. It can eventually lead to complete liver failure and death.1 The prevalence of liver cirrhosis and its morbidity and mortality is increased, making it a main health concern globally.1 2 Fatty liver disease (especially alcoholic fatty liver disease) and viral hepatitis (B or C) are the most common causes of cirrhosis.1 Vitamin D, a fat-soluble vitamin, has a significant role in health maintenance.3 It is necessary for calcium homeostasis4 and also has a role to regulate the body’s immune system.5 Liver has an important role in vitamin D metabolism, and various research indicated that vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is related to an increased risk of some chronic diseases (such as type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome) and mortality.6 7 Several studies showed that more than two-thirds of patients with CLD suffer from VDD.8 9 A decreased number of hepatocytes and changes in the hydroxylation of vitamin D in the liver are some causes of VDD in patients with cirrhosis.8 Kubesch et al reported an association between severe VDD and decompensated cirrhosis.10 Few studies have been conducted on the effect of vitamin D supplementation in patients with cirrhosis. This study aimed to identify the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the serum 25(OH) D3 as well as metabolic indices in patients with cirrhosis.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

In order to compare vitamin D supplementation on serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D3 (25(OH) D3), glycaemic indices, lipid profile and liver function tests in patients with cirrhosis, a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial was done in Baqiyatallah Hospital, Tehran, Iran (from October 2019 to March 2020).

Participants who met the following inclusion criteria were included in the study: (1) diagnosis of cirrhosis (based on clinical characteristics, laboratory factors, medical imaging (abdominal ultrasonography and fibroScan) and endoscopic findings of varices); (2) age 18–70 years, (3) serum level of 25(OH)D3<50 ng/mL. The exclusion criteria included: (1) history of hepatocellular carcinoma or jejunostomy or gastroplasty bypass; (2) pregnancy or lactating; (3) serious injuries or chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, renal or heart failure, any type of malignancy, myocardial infarction and stroke; (4) multivitamin or vitamin D consumption for the past 3 months; (5) alcohol drinking; and (6) digestive disorders such as coeliac disease or steatorrhoea.

An informed consent form was signed by all of the participants. The protocol of the study was confirmed by the for Research at Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences (IR.Bmsu.REC.1397.039) and also registered at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (IRCT20140502017522N2).

Sixty patients were randomly assigned to either intervention (n=30) or placebo (n=30) group. The randomisation (15 blocks with sizes of 4) sequence was generated using a computer-generated list of random numbers. The concealment of the sequence ensured via the sealed and opaque envelopes. Patients were recommended to take either one oral pearl vitamin D supplement (50 000 IU) or placebo per week, for 12 weeks. For applying the blinding procedure in the study, the colour, packaging and shape of the placebo were analogous to the vitamin D supplements.

The participants were instructed not to change their level of physical activity as well as dietary intake during the study period. At the baseline as well as the end of the study, a 2-day (1 day off and 1 day on) 24-hour dietary recall questionnaire and a reliable and valid11 scaled questionnaire, organised in nine multiple metabolic equivalent (MET) levels,12 were completed by all participants. Moreover, a trained nutritionist contacted patients once a week for follow-up.

Characteristics of the supplement

Vitamin D supplements (50 000 IU) and placebos used in this research were manufactured by Zahravi Pharmaceutical Company (Tabriz, Iran). The placebo (containing edible paraffin) was packaged in similar capsules.

Anthropometric measurements

To measure the weight and height, a Seca digital scale (to the nearest 100 g, Seca, Germany) and a Seca stadiometer (the nearest 0.5 cm, Seca, Germany) were used, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was computed by dividing the weight in kg by height in m2.

Laboratory tests

Blood samples were collected from the antecubital vein after 12 hours overnight fasting at the baseline and after 12 weeks of supplementation. Serum 25(OH)D3, glycaemic indices (insulin, fasting blood glucose (FBG), haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)), as primary outcome variables, and lipid profile (triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)) as well as liver function tests (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)), as secondary outcome variables, were measured in both groups.

Serum 25(OH)D3 and insulin levels were determined via chemiluminescence immuneassay (DiaSorin, USA). FBG was measured by enzymatic glucose oxidase approach using a kit (Pars Azmoon Co., Tehran, Iran). HbA1c was measured by cation-exchange chromatography through a BioSystem kit (BioSystems SA, Barcelona, Spain). The levels of TG, TC and HDL-C were enzymatically measured by applying the same kit (Pars Azmoon Co.) by a Selectra ProM autoanalyzer (Netherlands). Serum ALT and AST enzymes were measured using the kit (Pars Azmoon Co.) by the photometric approach. All intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were <5%. LDL-C was computed applying the following formula LDL-C=TC – HDL-C – 0.16 (TG). HOMA-IR was determined by the formula [fasting insulin (mU/L) × fasting glucose (mg/dL)/405.13

Statistical analysis

Considering a statistical power of 80% with a two-sided test with a type I error=0.05 and SD for the difference of serum 25(OH) D3 concentration,14 the sample size was determined as 22/group. Taking into account a 30% attrition rate, 60 patients were enrolled in the study.

Data were expressed as means±SE. The level of statistical significance level was set at 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed with STATA software V.13 (Stata Corp). Normality of the distribution of the variables was checked via Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Baseline parameters were compared using χ2 test. Analysis of covariance was used to adjust the effects of confounding variables (baseline preintervention outcomes, sex and and preintervention serum 25(OH)D3 level) on outcome measures. Independent Student’s t-test was used to compare the differences between the mean values of the items studied in both groups. To compare the mean values of variables before and after the intervention in each group, a paired t-test was used.

Results

The current research was done on 60 patients with cirrhosis. No significant harm or side effect was identified during the study; hence, the research ended at the expected date. Cirrhosis was due to hepatitis B virus in 24 patients, hepatitis C virus in 15 patients, cryptogenic in 14 patients, autoimmune hepatitis in 5 patients and alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in 2 patients.

Twelve patients discontinued the intervention. Forty-eight patients (vitamin D group (n=24) and placebo group (n=24)) completed the research (figure 1). At the beginning and end of the study, infection, ascites, variceal bleeding and encephalopathy were not observed in any of the patients.

Figure 1

Summary of subjects’ flow.

Regarding the baseline characteristics (demographic, biochemical and anthropometric data) and the dietary intake as well as physical activity, no significant difference was seen between the two study groups (tables 1 and 2).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study participants

Table 2

Nutritional intake and physical activity in two groups of vitamin D supplements and placebo

Table 3 shows the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the outcome variables based on the crude and adjusted models. The vitamin D supplementation significantly increases the serum 25 (OH) D3 before and after adjusting the covariates (p=0.0001). Moreover, the vitamin D supplementation significantly decreases FBG and HOMA-IR before (p=0.008 and p=0.0007, respectively) and after adjusting the covariates (p=0.006 and p=0.0017, respectively). Also, vitamin D supplementation decline insulin levels before and after adjusting the covariates (p=0.012 and p=0.085, respectively). The vitamin D supplementation did not change BMI, lipid profile and liver function tests before and after adjusting the covariates.

Table 3

Outcome distribution in Pre&Post intervention by study groups according to crude and adjusted models

Discussion

According to our results, vitamin D supplementation led to a significant increase in serum 25(OH) D3 as well as a significant decrease in FBG and HOMA-IR in patients with cirrhosis. However, vitamin D supplementation did not show any significant effect on lipid profile and liver function tests in these patients.

Our results indicated that vitamin D supplementation significantly increase serum 25 (OH) D3. These results are in line with the findings of other research.15 16 The liver has a major role in the synthesis of vitamin D. Not only the liver is the site of the first hydroxylation of vitamin D, but also vitamin D-binding protein is synthesised in the liver. The incidence of VDD increases with the progression of liver disease.17 Arteh et al indicated that 29.5% of patients with cirrhosis suffer from severe VDD.8 There is an inverse association between 25 (OH) D3 levels and the stages of fibrosis.18 Stokes et al reported that serum 25 (OH) D3≤6 ng/mL is an independent predictor of mortality among patients with cirrhosis.19 Some studies reported that vitamin D may decrease liver damage due to its anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties.5 19 On the other hand, due to the known role of vitamin D to maintain bone health and calcium metabolism, cirrhosis is associated with an increased risk of fractures.20 Therefore, evaluation of serum 25(OH) D3 among patients with cirrhosis is recommended.

Regarding the glycaemic indices, although vitamin D supplementation caused a significant decrease in FBG and HOMA-IR, a non-significant decrease in insulin and HbA1c was observed. These results are consistent with some previous researches.21 22 Barchetta et al showed that vitamin D supplementation did not change FBG, insulin or HOMA-IR in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).23 This inconsistency may be due to differences among the study population, kind of disease and duration of supplementation. Although there is not any agreement on the mechanism of the association between vitamin D and insulin resistance, some explanations exist: the presence of vitamin D receptors and 1-α hydroxylase in pancreatic β cells suggests a possible role of vitamin D in glucose homeostasis. So, VDD could lead to dysfunction of pancreatic β cells.22 1, 25(OH)2D3 elevates insulin production and secretion as well as expression of insulin receptors in pancreatic β cells and liver.22 24 Moreover, vitamin D may increase insulin sensitivity by enhancing the calcium status. Calcium is needed for the release of insulin from pancreatic cells.25 Also, elevated blood parathyroid hormone (PTH) is related to insulin resistance or glucose intolerance25 and vitamin D may improve insulin function by lowering PTH levels.26

In line with other studies,11 23 27 we found that the lipid profile did not change significantly after the vitamin D supplementation. The results of a meta-analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation had no significant effect on lipid profile in patients with NAFLD.28

According to the results of current research, although postintervention levels of both AST and ALT reduced, it was not significant; this finding is consistent with previous researches.11 16 23 28 29 Furthermore, an epidemiological study indicated that the risk of elevated ALT, and AST is higher in patients with VDD.30 Liver enzymes such as ALT and AST are common measurements for liver injury. Some studies indicated that VDD is associated with liver disease pathogenesis and severity.9 17 VDD may lead to liver damage by increasing inflammation and fibrosis as well as decreasing the antiviral response.18 As our searches shows, there is no clinical trial study that has investigated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on liver enzymes in patients with cirrhosis. The lack of significant effect in decreasing liver enzymes in our results could be due to low baseline values of ALT and AST. Vitamin D supplementation is more efficient on ALT and AST when their baseline levels are high.29

As far as our searches show, this is the first clinical trial aims to assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on metabolic indices in patients with cirrhosis. Since Baqiyatallah Hospital is a reference hospital in Tehran metropolis, the finding of present study may be generalised to Iranian patients with cirrhosis. This study has two limitations. First, some variables including fibrosis and steatosis scores were not assessed due to budget constraints. Second, the sample size of the study was relatively small, so it is suggested to conduct studies with a larger sample size to investigate the side effects of supplementation of 50 000 IU vitamin D3.

Our results indicated that the vitamin D supplementation (50 000 IU/week for 12 weeks) may enhance serum 25(OH)D3 and reduce HOMA-IR, as well as FBG levels in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, evaluation of serum 25(OH) D3 and vitamin D supplementation (if needed) may recommend in patients with cirrhosis.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Ethics approval

This study involves human participants and was approved by Ethics Committee for Research at Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences (IR.Bmsu.REC.1397.039). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Shahin Merat for his supports. Also, we would like to thank from the “Clinical Research Development Centre of Baqiyatallah hospital” for their kindly cooperation.

References

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors studied concept and designed the study. SRDK, BHA, MS and MT collected data. All authors analysed and interpreted data. MT drafted the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. MT acts as guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.