Quality assessment of included studies using the Effective Public Health Policy Projects Quantitative
Author (year) | Selection design | Study design | Confounders | Blinding | Data collection methods | Withdrawal and dropouts | Intervention integrity | Analysis | Rating | |||||
Participants received allocated intervention | Was consistency of intervention measured | Likelihood of contamination | Unit of allocation | Unit of analysis | Appropriate statistical methods | ITT | ||||||||
Ahrens et al (2003)21 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Weak | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Individual | Individual | Yes | Unclear | Weak |
Bryce et al (2017)23 | Weak | Moderate | Weak | Weak | Weak | Strong | 80%–100% | Yes | Yes | Practice | Individual | Yes | No | Weak |
Isaacs and Parry (1984)24 | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Weak | Weak | Moderate | 80%–100% | Yes | Unclear | Practice | Individual | Yes | Unclear | Weak |
Narotzki et al (2013)22 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | 80%–100% | Yes | Unclear | Individual | Individual | Yes | Yes | Weak |
ITT, intention to treat.