Table 3

Quality assessment of included studies using the Effective Public Health Policy Projects Quantitative

Author (year)Selection designStudy designConfoundersBlindingData collection methodsWithdrawal and dropoutsIntervention integrityAnalysisRating
Participants received allocated interventionWas consistency of intervention measuredLikelihood of contaminationUnit of allocationUnit of analysisAppropriate statistical methodsITT
Ahrens et al (2003)21 WeakStrongStrongWeakModerateWeakUnclearUnclearUnclearIndividualIndividualYesUnclearWeak
Bryce et al (2017)23 WeakModerateWeakWeakWeakStrong80%–100%YesYesPracticeIndividualYesNoWeak
Isaacs and Parry (1984)24 ModerateModerateModerateWeakWeakModerate80%–100%YesUnclearPracticeIndividualYesUnclearWeak
Narotzki et al (2013)22 WeakStrongStrongWeakStrongStrong80%–100%YesUnclearIndividualIndividualYesYesWeak
  • ITT, intention to treat.