Elsevier

Clinical Nutrition

Volume 26, Issue 3, June 2007, Pages 275-288
Clinical Nutrition

REVIEW
The impact of home parenteral nutrition on daily life—A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2006.10.002Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a lifesaving therapy in patients with severe intestinal failure that can be administered at home. However, patients have to face complex technological nutritional support issues at home, which will influence their personal life.

Objectives

This review aims to describe the implications of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) on the quality of life, as experienced by patients, as well as to describe the caregiver's reactions regarding these notions.

Search strategy

A systematic review of the literature published between 1965 and 2005 was conducted. Cinahl, Medline, and Psychlit databases were searched. Systematic data extraction and narrative data synthesis were performed.

Selection criteria

Papers were included if they described original research published in a peer reviewed journal, with a focus on adult patients on HPN and/or their family caregivers.

Data collection (and analysis)

A standardised record was used for data extraction.

Main results

A total of 26 studies were included. The quality of life reported by patients was moderate to good, but psychological problems, e.g. depression and anxiety, were common. Social life was disturbed due to the venous access device, the time schedule for HPN administration, the inability to have normal oral intake, gastrointestinal mobility problems, and physical complaints. Frequently mentioned somatic problems included fatigue, diarrhoea, pain, polyuria during infusion and sleep disruption.

Despite social restrictions, depression and fatigue, caregivers reported their overall QoL as similar to the norms for healthy populations.

Conclusion

Patients on HPN meet a broad range of problems. Apart from the well-known metabolic and infectious complications, many of these are psychological or social in nature.

Introduction

Parenteral nutrition is a lifesaving therapy in patients with severe intestinal failure. Most frequently, this failure results from extensive resections of small bowel due to inflammatory bowel disease or mesenteric thrombosis, or it is caused by loss of function because of severe motility disorders.

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) implies that a complete aqueous food formulation is administered intravenously. Generally, TPN is administered overnight for a period of 12 h. Patients feed two to seven times a week, depending on their remaining gut function. Importantly, these patients do not choose TPN out of their own free will, but it is usually the ultimate remaining option to maintain or improve their nutritional status.

In patients with prolonged intestinal failure, parenteral nutrition may be administered in the home setting. Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is nowadays a commonly used procedure in many developed countries.1 The patient population receiving HPN is small, but growing steadily.

Moving parenteral nutrition support from the hospital to the domestic setting results in a significant gain in quality of life.2 However, patients have to face complex technological nutritional support issues at home, which will inevitably influence their personal life. HPN administration is a time consuming and intrusive procedure that requires many adjustments. Besides, the underlying disease that led to intestinal failure may also cause a variety of physical complaints, due to the presence of a stoma, altered body image, etc. These factors frequently impose restrictions on daily life regarding social, physical and psychological function. Understanding the difficulties that these patients experience is crucial in order to offer the right modalities of support. Besides, these notions may help patients as well as health care workers to anticipate to problems in the future.

The aim of the present study was to identify the implications of HPN on the quality of life (QoL), including somatic, psychological, and social aspects of daily life, as experienced by patients, as well as to describe the caregiver's reactions regarding these notions.

Section snippets

Inclusion of studies

A systematic review of the literature was conducted. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Cinahl), Medline and Psychlit databases were searched for relevant studies published in between 1965 and 2005. Subject-specific keywords used to describe patients relevant for this review were selected by using the databases’ thesaurus function. We used the following keywords: home parenteral nutrition, successively combined with: depression, anxiety, QoL, psychological, social,

Selected studies

The search of Medline, PsycInfo, and Cinahl databases provided a total of 661 hits (duplicates included). After selecting studies by reading the abstracts, 43 studies remained. Twenty-three of these were excluded because inclusion criteria were not met. Nine of these did not describe original research, seven only reported on medical treatment and complications, two concerned patients with AIDS and cancer, one described hospital TPN patients, one discussed only appetite factors, one evaluated

Discussion

The aim of this study was to identify the impact of HPN on daily life as described in literature. We found that, overall, HPN patients experience a moderate to good QoL, but many suffer from depression and fatigue. HPN also limits social activities. Caregivers reported their overall QoL as similar to the norms that are published for other healthy populations, but common problems like depression and fatigue were articulated.

This review was conducted in a systematic and meticulous manner. In

Conclusion/recommendations

Both qualitative and quantitative studies provided information on symptoms experienced while receiving HPN. In general, it has become clear that HPN patients suffer from a broad range of problems, of which many are social or psychological in nature. Frequently expressed problems were depression, anxiety, limitations in social activities and travelling, sexual problems, fatigue, and diarrhoea.

To minimise the impact of HPN, patients could be supported in coping with these problems from the time

References (32)

  • P. Reddy et al.

    Cost and outcome analysis of home parenteral and enteral nutrition

    J Parenter Enteral Nutr

    (1998)
  • E.T. Herfindal et al.

    Survey of home nutritional support patients

    J Parenter Enteral Nutr

    (1989)
  • R.A. Robb et al.

    Subjective assessment of patient outcomes of home parenteral nutrition

    Am J Hosp Pharm

    (1983)
  • J.S. Scolapio et al.

    Sleep patterns of cyclic parenteral nutrition, a pilot study: are there sleepless nights?

    J Parenter Enteral Nutr

    (2002)
  • C.E. Smith et al.

    Responsibilities and reactions of family caregivers of patients dependent on total parenteral nutrition at home

    Public Health Nurs

    (1993)
  • C.E. Smith

    Quality of life in long-term total parenteral nutrition patients and their family caregivers

    J Parenter Enteral Nutr

    (1993)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text