Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

INTERMAP: the dietary data—process and quality control

Abstract

The aim of this report is to describe INTERMAP standardized procedures for assessing dietary intake of 4680 individuals from 17 population samples in China, Japan, UK and USA: Based on a common Protocol and Manuals of Operations, standardized collection by centrally trained certified staff of four 24 h dietary recalls, two timed 24-h urines, two 7-day histories of daily alcohol intake per participant; tape recording of all dietary interviews, and use of multiple methods for ongoing quality control of dietary data collection and processing (local, national, and international); one central laboratory for urine analyses; review, update, expansion of available databases for four countries to produce comparable data on 76 nutrients for all reported foods; use of these databases at international coordinating centres to compute nutrient composition. Chinese participants reported 2257 foods; Japanese, 2931; and UK, 3963. In US, use was made of 17 000 food items in the online automated Nutrition Data System. Average time/recall ranged from 22 min for China to 31 min for UK. Among indicators of dietary data quality, coding error rates (from recoding 10% random samples of recalls) were 2.3% for China, 1.4% for Japan, and UK; an analogous US procedure (re-entry of recalls into computer from tape recordings) also yielded low discrepancy rates. Average scores on assessment of taped dietary interviews were high, 40.4 (Japan) to 45.3 (China) (highest possible score: 48); correlations between urinary and dietary nutrient values—similar for men and women—were, for all 4680 participants, 0.51 for total protein, range across countries 0.40–0.52; 0.55 for potassium, range 0.30–0.58; 0.42 for sodium, range 0.33–0.46. The updated dietary databases are valuable international resources. Dietary quality control procedures yielded data generally indicative of high quality performance in the four countries. These procedures were time consuming. Ongoing recoding of random samples of recalls is deemed essential. Use of tape recorded dietary interviews contributed to quality control, despite feasibility problems, deemed remediable by protocol modification. For quality assessment, use of correlation data on dietary and urinary nutrient values yielded meaningful findings, including evidence of special difficulties in assessing sodium intake by dietary methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stamler J et al for the INTERMAP Research Group. INTERMAP: background, aims, design, methods, and descriptive statistics (non-dietary). J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 591–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu K et al. Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol. J Chronic Dis 1978; 31: 399–418.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu K . Measurement error and its impact on partial correlation and multiple linear regression analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 127: 864–874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beaton GH et al. Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am J Clin Nutr 1979; 32: 2546–2559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bingham SA . The dietary assessment of individuals: methods, accuracy, new techniques and recommendations. Nutr Abstr Rev A 1987; 57: 705–742.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dyer AR, Shipley M, Elliott P, for the INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group. Urinary electrolyte excretion in 24 hours and blood pressure in the INTERSALT Study. I. Estimates of reliability. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139: 927–939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dyer AR, Shipley M, Elliott P, for the INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group. Urinary electrolyte excretion in 24 hours and blood pressure in the INTERSALT Study. II. Estimates of electrolyte-blood pressure associations corrected for regression dilution bias. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139: 940–951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grandits GA, Bartsch GE, Stamler J . Methods issues in dietary data analyses in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65 (1 Suppl): 211S–227S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stamler J . The INTERSALT Study: background, methods, findings, and implications. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65(2 Suppl); 626S–642S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis B et al. The NHLBI nutrition data system. J Am Dietet Assoc 1980; 77: 642–647.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tillotson JL et al. Quality control in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Nutrition Modality. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 66S–90S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. People's Republic of China–United States Cardiovascular and Cardiopulmonary Epidemiology Research Group. Baseline survey, subsample (1983–1986), Part 2: nutrition. Data Preview, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 1992.

  13. People's Republic of China–United States Cardiovascular and Cardiopulmonary Epidemiology Research Group. Baseline survey, subsample (1983–1986), Part 3: food intake. Data Preview, US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 1992.

  14. Nelson M, Atkinson M, Meyer J, on behalf of the Nutritional Epidemiology Group U.K. A Photographic Atlas of Food Portion Sizes. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods (MAFF): London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feskanich D, Sielaff BH, Chong K, Buzzard IM . Computerized collection and analysis of dietary intake information. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1989; 30: 47–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. FOODBASE, Version 1.3 (1993). The Institutes of Brain Chemistry and Human Nutrition. The University of North London: London.

  17. Westrich BJ, Buzzard IM, Gatewood LC, McGovern PG . Accuracy and efficiency of estimating nutrient values in commercial food products using mathematical optimization. J Food Comp Anal 1994; 7: 223–239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Buzzard IM, Schakel SF, Ditter-Johnson J . Quality Control in the Use of Food and Nutrient Databases for Epidemiologic Studies. Quality and Accessibility of Food-related Data. AOAC International: Arlington, VA, 1995; pp 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schakel SF, Warren RA, Buzzard IM . Imputing nutrient values from manufacturers' data. In: Stumbo PJ (ed). Proceedings of the 14th National Nutrient Databank Conference. University of Iowa: Iowa City, 1989, pp 155–165.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schakel SF, Buzzard IM, Gebhardt SE . Procedures for estimating nutrient values for food composition databases. J Food Comp Anal 1997; 10: 102–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schakel SF et al. Enhancing data on nutrient composition of foods eaten by participants in the INTERMAP Study in China, Japan, United Kingdom, and United States. J Food Comp Anal 2003; 16: 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rand WM, Pennington JAT, Murphy SP, Klensin JC . Compiling Data for Food Composition Data Bases. United Nations University Press: Tokyo, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang G, Parpia B, Wen Z (eds). The Composition of Chinese Foods. Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine: Beijing, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Resources Council, Science and Technology Agency of Japan. The Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, 4th revised edn. Printing Bureau, Ministry of Finance: Japan, 1982.

  25. The Resources Council, Science and Technology Agency of Japan. The Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, Amino Acids, revised edn. Printing Bureau, Ministry of Finance: Japan, 1986.

  26. The Resources Council, Science and Technology Agency of Japan. The Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol and Vitamin E. Printing Bureau, Ministry of Finance: Japan, 1987.

  27. The Resources Council, Science and Technology Agency of Japan. The Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, Minerals. Printing Bureau, Ministry of Finance: Japan, 1991.

  28. The Resources Council, Science and Technology Agency of Japan. The Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, Dietary Fiber. Printing Bureau, Ministry of Finance: Japan, 1992.

  29. Suzuki Y, Tanuai S . Table of Trace Element Contents in Japanese Foodstuffs. Daiichi-shuppan: Tokyo, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Holland B et al. McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th edn. The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods: Cambridge, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Holland B, Unwin ID, Buss DH . Fruit and Nuts. First Supplement to the Fifth Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods: Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Holland B, Welch AA, Buss DH . Vegetable Dishes. Second Supplement to the Fifth Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods: Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Holland B, Brown J, Buss DH . Fish and Fish Products. Third Supplement to the Fifth Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods: Cambridge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chan W, Brown J, Buss DH . Miscellaneous Foods. Fourth Supplement to the Fifth Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods: Cambridge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chan W, Brown J, Lee SM, Buss DH . Meat, Poultry, and Game. Fifth Supplement to the Fifth Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods: Cambridge, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chan W, Brown J, Church SM, Buss DH . Meat Products and Dishes. Sixth Supplement to the Fifth Edition of McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. The Royal Society of Chemistry and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Foods: Cambridge, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R), Version 4.01. Developed by the Nutrition Coordinating Centre, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Food and Nutrient Database 29, December 1998.

  38. Bingham SA, Cummings JH . Urine nitrogen as an independent validatory measure of dietary intake: a study of nitrogen balance in individuals consuming their normal diet. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 42: 1276–1289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Stamler J et al, for the INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group. Inverse relation of dietary protein markers with blood pressure. Findings for 10,020 men and women in the INTERSALT Study. Circulation 1996; 94: 1629–1634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. National Research Council. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th edn. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1989.

  41. Maroni BJ, Steinman TI, Mitch WE . A method for estimating nitrogen intake of patients with chronic renal failure. Kidney Int 1985; 27: 58–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou BF et al, for the INTERMAP Research Group. Nutrient intake of middle-aged men and women in China, Japan, United Kingdom, and United States in the late 1990s: The INTERMAP Study. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 623–630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ueshima H et al for the INTERLIPID Research Group. Differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors between Japanese in Japan and Japanese-Americans in Hawaii: the INTERLIPID Study. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 631–639.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dyer AR, Elliott P, Chan Q, Stamler J for the INTERMAP Research Group. Dietary intake in male and female smokers, ex-smokers, and never smokers: the INTERMAP Study. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 641–654.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Stamler J, Elliott P, Chan Q for the INTERMAP Research Group. Appendix tables. J Hum Hypertens 2003; this issue (appendix tables from p 665–775).

  46. Elliott P, Chan Q, Stamler J, for the INTERMAP Research Group. Relationship of dietary protein (total, vegetable, animal) to blood pressure: INTERMAP findings. In press, 2003.

  47. Stamler J, Caggiula AW, Grandits GA . Relation of body mass and alcohol, nutrient, fiber, and caffeine intakes to blood pressure in the special intervention and usual care groups in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65 (1 Suppl): 338S–365S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Appel LJ et al, for the DASH Collaborative Research Group. A clinical trial of the effects of dietary patterns on blood pressure. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1117–1124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sacks FM et al, for the DASH-Sodium Collaborative Research Group. Effects on blood pressure of reduced sodium and the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 3–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Jabine TB, Straf ML, Tanur JM, Tourangeau R (eds). Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge between Disciplines. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Deharveng G et al. Comparison of nutrients in the food composition table available in the nine European countries participating in EPIC. Eur J Clin Nutr 1999; 53: 60–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Isaksson B . Urinary nitrogen output as a validity test in dietary surveys. Am J Clin Nutr 1980; 33: 4–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bingham SA et al. Reference values for analyses of 24-h urine collections known to be complete. Ann Clin Biochem 1988; 25: 610–619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bingham SA . The use of 24-h urine samples and energy expenditures to validate dietary measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 59 (Suppl): 227S–231S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wassertheil-Smoller S et al. Estimation of protein intake: comparison of dietary assessment and urinary excretion. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1990; 16 (Suppl 8): S28–S31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sanchez-Castello CP, Warrender S, Whitehead TP, James WPT . An assessment of the sources of dietary salt in a British population. Clin Sci 1987; 72: 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Mattes RD, Donnelly D . Relative contributions of dietary sodium sources. J Am Coll Nutr 1991; 10: 383–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Stamler J . Dietary salt and blood pressure. Ann NY Acad Sci 1993; 676: 122–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Dennis BH . Public health policy and salt: doing the right thing. Perspect Appl Nutr 1995; 3: 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Grant 2-RO1-HL50490 from the US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; by the Chicago Health Research Foundation; and by national agencies in China, Japan (the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research [A], No. 090357003), and the UK.

It is a pleasure to express appreciation to the dietary interviewers, Site Nutritionists, and other INTERMAP staff at local, national, and international centres; a partial listing of these colleagues is given in reference 1 of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Stamler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennis, B., Stamler, J., Buzzard, M. et al. INTERMAP: the dietary data—process and quality control. J Hum Hypertens 17, 609–622 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001604

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001604

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links